Technological capability, transactional capability and firm boundaries

Capacidad tecnológica, capacidad transaccional y fronteras de las firmas

Diogo Campos-Teixeira , Jorge Tello-Gamarra

Suma de Negocios, 12(27), 124-135, julio-diciembre 2021, ISSN 2215-910X

https://doi.org/10.14349/sumneg/2021.V12.N27.A4

Received on June 5, 2021
Accepted on September 5, 2021
Online on November 14, 2021

Resumen

Aunque existen estudios sobre los límites de la firma, este campo de estudio sigue siendo un tema que necesita mayor desarrollo. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar los límites de la firma a la luz de las capacidades tecnológica y transaccional. El método utilizado fue el estudio de casos múltiples en firmas de diferentes estratos de intensidad tecnológica. Los principales resultados de este estudio pueden expresarse mediante tres proposiciones. Primero, todas las firmas industriales tienen capacidad tecnológica y capacidad transaccional. Segundo, las firmas con capacidades más desarrolladas (tecnológica y transaccional) amplían sus límites. Tercero, las firmas pueden ampliar sus límites acumulando capacidad tecnológica, capacidad transaccional o ambas. Como conclusión del artículo, las capacidades tecnológicas y transaccionales son esenciales para la expansión de las fronteras de las firmas en cualquier extracto de intensidad tecnológica.


Palabras clave:
Límites de la firma,
capacidad tecnológica,
capacidad transaccional,
firma,
capacidades

Códigos JEL:
L21, L22, L25, H32

Abstract

Although there is research pertaining to the boundaries of firms, this field of study still requires more development. The objective of this paper is to analyse firm boundaries considering technological and transactional capabilities. The method chosen was that of multiple case studies conducted in firms having different technological intensity levels. The main results are contained in three propositions. Firstly, all industrial firms have technological and transactional capability. Secondly, firms with more developed capabilities (technological and transactional) expand their boundaries. Thirdly, the firms are able to expand their boundaries by means of the accumulation of technological capability, transactional capability, or both. As a conclusion to this paper, technological and transactional capabilities are essential for expanding the boundaries of firms at any level of technological intensity.


Keywords:
Firm boundaries,
technological capability,
transactional capability,
firm,
capabilities.

Artículo Completo
Bibliografía

Argyres, N. S., & Liebeskind, J. P. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review24(1), 49-63.

Argyres, N. S., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). Capabilities, transaction costs and firm boundaries: A dynamic perspective and integration. In Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1554033.

Argyres, N. S., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organization Science23(6), 1643-1657.

Barney, J. B. (1999). How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review40(3), 137-145.

Barney, J. B. (2020). Measuring firm performance in a way that is consistent with strategic management theory. Academy of Management Discoveries6(1), 5-7.

Baronian, L. (2020). Digital Platforms and the Nature of the Firm. Journal of Economic Issues54(1), 214-232.

Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness22(4831), 69-101.

Bhatia, M. S. (2021). Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning. Business Strategy and the Environment. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2775

Chandler, A. D. (1992). Organizational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise. Journal of Economic Perspectives6(3), 79-100.

Cheung, S. N. (1983). The contractual nature of the firm. The Journal of Law and Economics26(1), 1-21.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica4(16), 386-405.

Cohney, S., & Hoffman, D. A. (2020). Transactional scripts in contract stacks. Minnesota Law Review105, 319.

Connelly, B. L., Li, Q., Shi, W., & Lee, K. B. (2020). CEO dismissal: Consequences for the strategic risk taking of competitor CEOs. Strategic Management Journal41(11), 2092-2125.

Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization science7(5), 477-501.

Demsetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization4(1), 141-61.

Eapen, A., & Krishnan, R. (2019). Transferring tacit know-how: Do opportunism safeguards matter for firm boundary decisions?. Organization Science30(4), 715-734.

Figueiredo, P. N. (2002). Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement. Research Policy31(1), 73-94.

Foss, K., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Resources and transaction costs: How property rights economics furthers the resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal26(6), 541-553.

Foss, N. J. (1996). Firms, incomplete contracts, and organizational learning. Human Systems Management15(1), 17-26.

Garzella, S., Fiorentino, R., Caputo, A., & Lardo, A. (2021). Business model innovation in SMEs: The role of boundaries in the digital era. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(1), 31-43.

Gawer, A. (2020). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 102045.

Guichardaz, R., Bach, L., & Penin, J. (2019). Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability. Industry and Innovation26(7), 843-869.

Gulbrandsen, B., Lambe, C. J., & Sandvik, K. (2017). Firm boundaries and transaction costs: The complementary role of capabilities. Journal of Business Research78, 193-203.

Hernani-Merino, M., & Tello-Gamarra, J. (2019). Evidence of transactional capability in two different countries. European Business Review31(4), 470-487.

Huikkola, T., Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Gebauer, H. (2020). Firm boundaries in servitization: Interplay and repositioning practices. Industrial Marketing Management90, 90-105.

Iammarino, S., Padilla-Pérez, R., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Technological capabilities and global–local interactions: the electronics industry in two Mexican regions. World Development36(10), 1980-2003.

Itami, H., & Roehl, T. W. (1991). Mobilizing invisible assets. Harvard University Press.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal39(8), 2255-2276.

Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G. (2005). The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal26(5), 395-413.

Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2005). The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing69(4), 177-192.

Katz, J. M. (1984). Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage: further reflections on a comparative case-study program. Journal of Development Economics16(1-2), 13-37.

Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review39(3), 86-100.

Koenig, C. (2020). The boundaries of the firm and the reach of competition law: Corporate group liability and sanctioning in the EU and the US. The Intersections between Competition Law and Corporate Law and Finance. Cambridge University Press.

Kukharskyy, B. (2020). A tale of two property rights: Knowledge, physical assets, and multinational firm boundaries. Journal of International Economics122, 1-29.

Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development20(2), 165-186.

Liu, M., & Trefler, D. (2020). What’s the big idea? Multi-function products, firm scope and firm boundaries. Journal of Economic Behavior e Organization180, 381-406.

Madhok, A. (2002). Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource‐based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal23(6), 535-550.

Mahoney, J. T., & Qian, L. (2013). Market frictions as building blocks of an organizational economics approach to strategic management. Strategic Management Journal34(9), 1019-1041.

Meissner, D., Burton, N., Galvin, P., Sarpong, D., & Bach, N. (2021). Understanding cross border innovation activities: The linkages between innovation modes, product architecture and firm boundaries. Journal of Business Research128, 762-769.

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing54(4), 20-35.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, E. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

OCDE. (2003). Science, technology and industry scoreboard. www.oecd.org/sti/17130701.pdf.

Ovuakporie, O. D., Pillai, K. G., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2021). Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance. Research Policy50(1), 104-146.

Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate change7(3), 433-452.

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press.

Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (1998). Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge‐based, and measurement explanations for make‐or‐buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal19(9), 853-877.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review68(3), 79-91.

Reichert, F. M., Beltrame, R. S., Corso, K. B., Trevisan, M., & Zawislak, P. A. (2011). Technological capability’s predictor variables. Journal of Technology Management e Innovation6(1), 14-25.

Reichert, F. M., Janissek-Muniz, R., Heinze, M., Cainelli, A. D. S., & Zawislak, P. A. (2020). Innovation Capabilities and the role of Strategic Intelligence. CONF-IRM 2020. 13. https://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2020/13

Reichert, F. M., & Zawislak, P. A. (2014). Technological capability and firm performance. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation9(4), 20-35.

Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. The Economic Journal82(327), 883-896.

Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Harvard Economic Studies, 40,20.

Simshauser, P. (2020). Merchant utilities and boundaries of the firm: Vertical integration in energy-only markets. EPRG Working Paper 2008, Energy Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge.

Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. (1980). Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 317-336.

Teixeira, K. A., Puffal, D. P., & Ferrazza D. S. (2020). Organisational capabilities for innovation: A case study on the management and transactional capability. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(4), 447-465.

Tello-Gamarra, J., & Zawislak, P. A. (2013). Transactional capability: Innovation’s missing link. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 18(34), 2-8.

Tello-Gamarra, J., Hernani-Merino, M., & Límaco-Mamani, B. I. (2017). Capacidad transaccional: evidencias del sistema financiero peruano. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(1), 37-50.

Tello-Gamarra, J. (2013). A natureza tecnológico-transacional e o desempenho da firma [Dissertation]. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Ulrich, D., & Lake, D. (1991). Organizational capability: Creating competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(1), 77-92.

Valdez-Juárez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity7(1), 8.

Vasconcelos, R. B. B. D., Santos, J. F. D., & Andrade, J. A. D. (2020). Innovation in micro and small enterprises: resources and capabilities. Revista de Administração Contemporânea25(2), 1-19.

Weber, L., & Mayer, K. J. (2011). Designing effective contracts: Exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Academy of Management Review36(1), 53-75.

Wernerfelt, B. (1996). Efficient marketing communication: Helping the customer learn. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 239-246.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. The Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal12(2),75-94.

Zawislak, P. A., Cherubini, A., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation7(2), 14-27.

Zawislak, P. A., Fracasso, E. M., & Tello-Gamarra, J. (2018). Technological intensity and innovation capability in industrial firms. Innovation and Management Review15(2), 189-207.

PDF
EPUB

Instituciones

Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS – Brazil
Copyright © 2021. Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Colombia

(Visited 130 times, 1 visits today)