The effect of risk communication on financial decisions based on income level
El efecto de la comunicación del riesgo en las decisiones financieras según el nivel de ingresos
Cristhian Oswaldo Beltrán-Oicatá
,
Marithza Sandoval-Escobar
,
Ricardo Macias Bohorquez
![]()
Suma de Negocios, 17(36), 42-51, enero-junio 2026, ISSN 2215-910X
https://doi.org/10.14349/sumneg/2026.V17.N36.A4
Received on: December 1, 2025
Accepted on: March 24, 2026
Online: May 29, 2026
Introducción/Objetivo: el crecimiento del crédito de consumo ha incrementado la deuda de los hogares, especialmente en América Latina, donde el sobreendeudamiento es frecuente debido a limitaciones en la educación financiera. Este estudio examina cómo la comunicación del riesgo (información equilibrada versus desequilibrada), el tipo de producto (básico, medio, alto) y el nivel de ingresos del consumidor (bajo, medio, alto) influyen en el uso de tarjetas de crédito y en las decisiones de pago a cuotas.
Metodología: se diseñó un experimento de elección discreta con 90 participantes (62 mujeres, 28 hombres; edad media = 29.5 años) clasificados por ingreso per cápita en tres niveles (bajo, medio, alto).
Resultados: los resultados muestran que la información equilibrada incrementó la probabilidad de elegir la tarjeta de crédito y redujo el número de cuotas seleccionadas. El efecto fue más pronunciado en los consumidores de bajos ingresos, quienes, en ausencia de información equilibrada, tendieron a financiarse en un mayor número de cuotas. Por el contrario, los grupos de ingresos medios y altos manifestaron mayor preferencia por productos de valor medio y alto, intensificada por la información desequilibrada, que condujo a plazos de pago más extensos. Un modelo de regresión logística ordinal confirmó que la provisión de información equilibrada reduce de manera significativa el número de cuotas, con mayor impacto en los participantes de bajos ingresos.
Conclusiones: estos hallazgos subrayan el papel de la comunicación balanceada en la mitigación del riesgo financiero y evidencian la importancia de estrategias de alfabetización en riesgos que complementen la educación financiera tradicional. La investigación contribuye a la literatura sobre comportamiento del consumidor y economía del comportamiento al mostrar que la calidad de la información puede moldear decisiones crediticias más responsables, con implicaciones relevantes para el diseño de políticas públicas y la regulación de mercados financieros en contextos de vulnerabilidad económica.
Palabras clave:
Decisiones financieras,
comunicación del riesgo,
alfabetización en riesgo,
crédito de consumo,
tarjetas de crédito,
educación financiera,
deuda de los hogares,
comportamiento del consumidor
Códigos JEL:
D14, D83, D91, I31
Introduction/Objective: this study examines how risk communication (balanced vs. unbalanced information), product type (basic, mid-range, high-end), and consumer income level (low, middle, high) influence credit card use and installment payment decisions.
Methodology: a discrete choice experiment was designed with 90 participants (62 women, 28 men; mean age = 29.5 years) classified by per capita income into three levels (low, middle, high).
Results: the results show that balanced information increased the likelihood of choosing a credit card and reduced the number of installments selected. Conversely, middle- and high-income groups showed a greater preference for mid- and high-value products, intensified by unbalanced information, which led to longer payment terms. An ordinal logistic regression model confirmed that providing balanced information significantly reduces the number of installments, with a greater impact on low-income participants.
Conclusions: these findings underscore the role of balanced communication in mitigating financial risk and highlight the importance of risk literacy strategies that complement traditional financial education. This research contributes to the literature on consumer behaviour and behavioural economics by showing that the quality of information can shape more responsible credit decisions, with relevant implications for public policy design and the regulation of financial markets in contexts of economic vulnerability.
Keywords:
Financial decisions,
risk communication,
risk literacy,
consumer credit,
credit cards,
financial education,
household debt,
consumer behaviour.
JEL Codes:
D14, D83, D91, I31
Abrantes-Braga, F. D. M. A., & Veludo-de-Oliveira, T. (2020). Help me, I can’t afford it! Antecedents and consequence of risky indebtedness behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 2223-2244. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2019-0455
Arkes, H. R., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2016). How bad is incoherence? Decision, 3(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000043
Arsyianti, L. D., & Kassim, S. (2021). Charity and debt behaviors comparison: Perception of low-income households. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(4), 535-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2019-0020
Ashby, N. (2017). Numeracy predicts preference consistency: Deliberative search heuristics increase choice consistency for choices from description and experience. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(2), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005672
Ashby, R. (2024). The Influence of the buy-now-pay-later payment mode on consumer choice. Journal of Retailing, 101(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETAI.2025.01.003
Banerjee, A., Claudia, M. A., & Puentes, E. (2025). Better strategies for saving more: Evidence from three interventions in Chile. Journal of Development Economics, 173, 103405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2024.103405
Birkenmaier, J., Zhang, Y., & Huang, J. (2025). Financial services mistreatment, financial access, and financial well-being: A causal mediation analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104253
Burlinson, A., Giulietti, M., & Battisti, G. (2018). Technology adoption, consumer inattention and heuristic decision-making: Evidence from a UK district heating scheme. Research Policy, 47(10), 1873-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.06.017
Calcott, P., & Petkov, V. (2024). How innocuous is it to approximate globally decreasing impatience with quasi-hyperbolic discounting? Journal of Mathematical Economics, 111, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATECO.2024.102958
Chen, F., Yu, D., & Sun, Z. (2023). Investigating the associations of consumer financial knowledge and financial behaviors of credit card use. Heliyon, 9(1), e12713. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E12713
Ciranka, S., Chevallier, C., & Nettle, D. (2026). Low socioeconomic status amplifies the perceived rarity of large rewards. Cognition, 270, 106409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106409
Clark, R. L., Lin, C., Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Sticha, A. (2025). Evaluating the effects of a low-cost, online financial education program. 232, 106952. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167268125000721
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. in statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cokely, E. T., Feltz, A., Ghazal, S., Allan, J. N., Petrova, D., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2018). Skilled decision theory: From intelligence to numeracy and expertise. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Second Edition (pp. 476-505). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.026
DANE. (2023). Comunicado de prensa sobre el índice de pobreza. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/operaciones/PM/cp-PMClaseSociales-2022.pdf
Davoli, M., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2020). Culture and adult financial literacy: Evidence from the United States. Economics of Education Review, 78, 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONEDUREV.2020.102013
De Bruijn, E. J., & Antonides, G. (2022). Poverty and economic decision making: A review of scarcity theory. In Theory and Decision (Vol. 92, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09802-7
ECLAC. (2024). Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe 2024. Eclac.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fu, S., Li, E., Liao, L., Wang, Z., & Xiang, H. (2025). Unveiling the villain: Credit supply and the debt trap. Journal of Empirical Finance, 81, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEMPFIN.2025.101592
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2017). Designing visual AIDS that promote risk literacy: A systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Human Factors, 59(4), 582-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690634
Garcia-Retamero, R., Sobkow, A., Petrova, D., Garrido, D., & Traczyk, J. (2019). Numeracy and risk literacy: What have we learned so far? 22, E10. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2019.16
Goyal, K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(1), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12605
He, S., Blasch, J., van Beukering, P., & Wang, J. (2022). Energy labels and heuristic decision-making: The role of cognition and energy literacy. Energy Economics, 114, 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2022.106279
Hendy, P., Slonim, R., & Atalay, K. (2021). Unsticking credit card repayments from the minimum: Advice, anchors and financial incentives. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2021.100505
Hjeij, M., & Vilks, A. (2023). A brief history of heuristics: How did research on heuristics evolve? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2023 10:1, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01542-z
International Monetary Fund. (2023). Household debt, loans and debt securities. Global Debt Database. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/HH_LS@GDD/CAN/GBR/USA/DEU/ITA/FRA/JPN/VNM
Jiang, J., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., & Meng, J. (2025). Inattention and credit card repayment date. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 230, 106906. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2025.106906
Kondratjeva, O., Roll, S. P., Bufe, S., & Grinstein-Weiss, M. (2021). Using financial tips to guide debt repayment: Experimental evidence from low- and moderate-income tax filers. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCEC.2020.101612
Kozol, E. (2026). The financial literacy gap: A Cross-National study on economic Development, digital finance and inclusion. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 31(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-026-00343-0
Kozyreva, A., & Hertwig, R. (2021). The interpretation of uncertainty in ecological rationality. Synthese, 198(2), 1517-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-019-02140-W
Lejarraga, T., & Hertwig, R. (2021). How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality. Psychological Bulletin, 147(6), 535-564. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000324
Liu, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). Financial literacy, self-efficacy and risky credit behavior among college students: Evidence from online consumer credit. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2021.100569
Lusardi, A. (2015). Risk literacy. Italian Economic Journal, 1(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-015-0011-x
Madeira, C. (2024). Indebtedness and labor risk sorting across consumer lender types in Chile. Journal of Banking Regulation, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41261-024-00250-1/TABLES/8
Melo Guerrero, E., Rodríguez Laguna, R., Martínez Damián, M. Á., Hernández Ortíz, J., & Razo Zárate, R. (2020). Consideraciones básicas para la aplicación de experimentos de elección discreta: una revisión X1 – Basic considerations for the application of discrete choice experiments: A review. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 11(59), 4-30.
Methling, F., Abdeen, S. J. M., & von Nitzsch, R. (2022). Heuristics in multi-criteria decision-making: The cost of fast and frugal decisions. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 10, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJDP.2022.100013
Montevechi, A. A., Miranda, R. de C., Medeiros, A. L., & Montevechi, J. A. B. (2024). Advancing credit risk modelling with Machine Learning: A comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 137, 109082. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGAPPAI.2024.109082
Ortiz, J. M., Teixeira, L. I., Falcão, N. N. L., Soki, E. A., & Almeida, R. M. (2024). Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 110, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCEC.2024.102193
Perrin, O. D., Cho, J., Cokely, E. T., Allan, J. N., Feltz, A., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2025). Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 10(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00641-6
Pitthan, F., & De Witte, K. (2025). How learning about behavioural biases can improve financial literacy? International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2025.103989
Posit team (2025). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.posit.co/.
Privitera, G. (2020). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (Third edit). Sage Publications.
Reyna, V. F., Roue, J. E., Edelson, S. M., Singh, A., & Fennema, M. G. (2025). High in numeracy, high in reflection, but still irrationally biased: How gist explains risky choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(9), 1453-1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001441
Rooney, G., & Loibl, C. (2026). Scarcity mindset as a predictor of cryptocurrency investments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 112(10), 102867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2025.102867
Shah, S. S., Qureshi, F., Memon, F. A., & Uddin, M. H. (2024). Financial literacy and investment behavior of individuals in Pakistan: Evidence from an Environment prone to religious sentiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 44, 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2024.100974
The World Bank. (2025). Debt Overview: Development news, research, data. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/debt/overview
Thekdi, S., & Aven, T. (2026). Risk science in practice: A framework for gauging risk principles in domain-specific discourse. Risk Analysis, 46(2), e70176. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70176
Van Raaij, W. F., Riitsalu, L., & Põder, K. (2023). Direct and indirect effects of self-control and future time perspective on financial well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 99, 102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2023.102667
Verma, R., & Chatterjee, D. (2025). Relative impact of digital and traditional financial inclusion on financial resilience: Evidence from 13 emerging countries. Journal of Economics and Business, 133, 106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2025.106233
Velandia-Morales, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Martínez, R. (2022). Economic inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 809101. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy20.cede
Wegwarth, O., Kurzenhäuser-Carstens, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Overcoming the knowledge-behavior gap: The effect of evidence-based HPV vaccination leaflets on understanding, intention, and actual vaccination decision. Vaccine, 32(12), 1388-1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.038
Wei, H. L., Deng, C. D., Zhu, S. Y., He, J., & He, Y. (2024). Paying for emotions? Information processing inhibition of positive emotions in consumer decision making. Current Psychology, 44(1), 551-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07170-3
Xiaohui, L. (2025). Credit risk. Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese Economics, 1675-1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4036-9_832
Yadav, M., Kathuria, A., Chopra, N., & Singh, A. (2026). Exploring the role of digital financial literacy in promoting sustainable digital financial inclusion among salaried peoples. 111-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01715-4_7
Yu, Y., Liu, J., & Guo, R. (2025). Credit cards, risk coping and household financial vulnerability. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-10023-7
Dimensions
PlumX
Instituciones
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia
Copyright © 2026. Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Colombia

